Unclear Wording on Property Access Rights Leads to Court of Appeal

Many court battles arise because of a lack of clarity in documentation which leaves an agreement capable of being interpreted in more than one way.

A recent case, which involved a landowner's access to his property, illustrates this point. The conveyance which transferred the property to him gave him the right to access his land at any point from his neighbour's land.

When his neighbour wished to build a fence with a single opening in it, the man went to court claiming that to do so would constitute an interference with his legal rights of access to his property as granted to him in the conveyance.

The argument went all the way to the Court of Appeal, which agreed that the wording of the conveyance was unclear and that, in the circumstances, a limitation on the landowner's ability to access his own land would constitute an 'actionable interference'.

Appearing at the Court of Appeal is a very expensive way to settle a dispute and could have been avoided had the conveyance been more precisely worded. For advice on all aspects of property and land law, contact us.
View my profile
DanielLewis
Director
E:
The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.