Lack of Evidence Limits Claim

When a GP referred a female patient to the local hospital for an urgent investigation, it should have led to her prompt diagnosis and treatment for ovarian cancer.

However, the referral letter was lost and, furthermore, the GP had failed to tell the patient that the referral was urgent. As a result, the operation she needed did not take place until several months after it should have done.

The judge concluded that the GP’s failure to advise the woman that the referral was of an urgent nature did constitute a breach of the duties owed by a doctor to a patient.

However, the judge was not able to establish how much less invasive the surgery would have been had the diagnosis and procedure taken place earlier. There was also no conclusive statistical evidence of the effect of delay on life expectancy in such circumstances.

Accordingly, the woman was awarded general damages because of the delay but was denied damages on the basis that the delay was likely to have reduced her life expectancy.

If your medical treatment has led to distress or injury because of negligence on the part of those responsible for your care, contact us for advice.
View my profile
Vicki Hains
Consultant
E:
The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.